During his second inaugural address, President Abraham Lincoln gave the nation its most enduring obligation to those who served. One hundred and sixty-one years later, the country is still reckoning with what that obligation means.

---

It was March 4, 1865. The Civil War was nearly over and would ultimately claim more than 620,000 lives, approximately 2% of the population of the nation at the time. In Washington, D.C., President Abraham Lincoln gave his second inaugural address in front of the newly constructed Capitol dome, a construction effort that Lincoln had consistently advocated for throughout the war despite growing constraints on supplies and materials.

“If people see the Capitol going on,” Lincoln had stated during the war, “it is a sign we intend the Union shall go on.”

Lincoln’s second inaugural address was a mere 703 words. Most of those words were given over to a moral reckoning with slavery and the war it had produced, but the closing paragraph turned toward the future. Within it, Lincoln placed a sentence that would outlast every policy, every administration, and every generation of veterans that followed:

“With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation’s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan.”

In fewer than 30 words, Lincoln had articulated a national covenant. Service to one’s country creates an obligation to that person which does not end at discharge, or at the armistice, or at the funeral. The nation owes a debt to those who fight in its service, and to the families of those who die defending it.

Lincoln would never see how his words materialized in the nation he sought to change, he was assassinated 41 days later. As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary, Lincoln’s words offer a useful measure of national progress. The question is not whether Americans honor military service in principle. The question is whether the country continues to fulfill that obligation in practice.

From Words on Paper to Words on a Wall

For nearly a century, Lincoln’s words existed as moral aspiration rather than institutional mandate. The Veterans’ Bureau, created in 1921 to consolidate the federal government’s chaotic post-World War I response to veteran needs, became the Veterans Administration in 1930. But it was not until 1959 that Lincoln’s charge was formally attached to the agency charged with carrying it out.

That year, Veterans Administration Administrator Sumner G. Whittier ordered Lincoln’s words installed at the entrance to the agency’s headquarters in Washington. From that point forward, every employee and visitor entered beneath the promise that had originated on the Capitol steps nearly a century earlier.

In March 2023, the Department of Veterans Affairs updated it to reflect the full scope of those the agency serves. The new language reads:

“To fulfill President Lincoln’s promise to care for those who have served in our nation’s military and for their families, caregivers, and survivors.”

The updated motto preserves Lincoln’s covenant while extending it to the women veterans, caregivers, and survivors whose service and sacrifice the original language did not include.

The promise wasn’t changed, it was merely broadened to reflect the reality of the sacrifice military service has demanded upon those who serve.

The Gap Between Promise and Practice

Lincoln’s promise has endured. Fulfilling it has been far more difficult.

Again and again, the nation has expanded its commitment to veterans only to discover that the institutions responsible for carrying out that commitment were not yet prepared for the task.

• The Civil War pension system, built in part on Lincoln’s foundation, became one of the largest federal expenditures of the late 19th century, almost 40% of the entire federal budget, but it excluded the Black service members who made up nearly 10% of the Union Army.
• The post-World War I bonus promised to veterans was delayed, reduced, and ultimately paid almost 15 years later after the1932 Bonus Army march on Washington ended in confrontation.
• The VA system that Whittier helped modernize in the 1950s would be overwhelmed by the Vietnam-era veterans, which also included women veterans who had been wounded in combat, a population in need that the VA of the time was not prepared to care for.

The pattern is not one of indifference, rarely will you find an elected official who does not publicly claim to “support the troops.” The pattern is a byproduct of institutional lag. The nation has repeatedly honored the spirit of Lincoln’s promise. The struggle has been ensuring that promise reaches every veteran and military family who needs it.

Every generation has confronted the same question: if Lincoln’s promise remains valid, how should it be fulfilled?

That gap between promise and practice is precisely where the D’Aniello Institute for Veterans and Military Families (IVMF) at Syracuse University operates, focusing its programs and services upon data-driven solutions to support servicemembers and their families in their post-service lives.

Research as the Foundation of Obligation

Every generation has confronted the same question: if Lincoln’s promise remains valid, how should it be fulfilled?

In the twenty-first century, answering that question increasingly requires something previous generations lacked: reliable evidence about what veterans and military families actually experience after service.

Founded at Syracuse University in 2011, the D’Aniello Institute for Veterans and Military Families (IVMF) was built around a simple premise: fulfilling Lincoln’s promise requires more than good intentions. It requires understanding, with precision, the challenges veterans and military families face and identifying the solutions that produce measurable outcomes.

Lincoln’s promise was never solely about compensation or benefits. It was about ensuring that those who served—and the families who served alongside them—had the opportunity to thrive in the nation they helped preserve.

Research conducted through the IVMF’s Military Family Lifestyle Survey continues to demonstrate how consequential military transition remains long after a servicemember leaves uniform. In the 2025 survey, which gathered responses from more than 6,000 military-connected individuals, 58 percent of veteran respondents described their transition from military to civilian life as difficult or very difficult. Forty-one percent reported feeling unprepared to navigate that transition. The long-term effects were equally striking: veteran families reporting a difficult transition were three times more likely to struggle financially and more than twice as likely to experience food insecurity than those who reported a successful transition.

Those findings reinforce what Lincoln understood intuitively. The nation’s obligation does not end when military service ends.

That reality was echoed in 2025 testimony before the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, where IVMF Managing Director Barb Carson highlighted the continuing challenges servicemembers face as they move from military to civilian life. While military transition is often discussed as a single event, the evidence suggests it is a years-long process that influences employment, financial stability, wellbeing, and community connection. Supporting veterans after service requires more than gratitude. It requires coordinated systems capable of helping individuals and families navigate one of the most significant transitions of their lives.

Research has also shown that veteran challenges rarely occur in isolation. Data generated through IVMF’s AmericaServes network found that veterans seeking assistance frequently experience multiple, interconnected needs at the same time. Employment challenges often overlap with housing concerns, financial hardship, transportation barriers, health issues, or family caregiving responsibilities. The finding underscores a lesson repeated throughout American history: successful support requires seeing veterans and military families as whole people rather than a collection of separate problems.

The obligation Lincoln described extends beyond helping veterans overcome hardship. It also includes creating opportunities for continued contribution and success. In testimony before Congress in 2025, IVMF Director of Research Misty Fox highlighted the extraordinary economic impact of veteran entrepreneurship in the United States. Veteran-owned businesses generate more than $1 trillion in annual receipts, support millions of jobs, and contribute to communities across the country. Their success serves as a reminder that veterans are not only recipients of support but builders, innovators, employers, and civic leaders whose contributions continue long after military service concludes.

This is what binding up the nation’s wounds looks like in practice. Not a single act of gratitude. Not a speech. Not a benefit program. A sustained commitment to understanding what veterans and military families need, responding to those needs, and creating pathways through which they can continue to thrive.

More than 160 years after Lincoln’s address, the challenge is no longer defining the obligation. The challenge is understanding, with evidence, what fulfilling it requires.

The Promise at 250

Lincoln’s second inaugural remains one of the most studied speeches in American history. Yet its closing paragraph was not primarily a literary achievement. It was a directive.

A president standing before a nation exhausted by war told Americans what they owed the people who had fought it.

One hundred and sixty-one years later, that directive is still being interpreted, still being debated, and still being tested against reality. The VA’s updated mission statement reflects an ongoing effort to make Lincoln’s promise more inclusive. Institutions like IVMF reflect an ongoing effort to make it more effective.

Lincoln never fully defined what it meant to care for those who had borne the battle. Every generation since has been left to answer that question for itself.

As America approaches its 250th anniversary, the obligation remains unchanged.

Two and a half centuries after the nation’s founding, and more than 160 years after Lincoln gave voice to that obligation, the work continues. At Syracuse University, through research, programs, partnerships, and policy leadership, IVMF continues its own contribution to that effort.

The promise remains unfinished.

The responsibility remains unchanged.